Difference between revisions of "2015 BRAINSFit registration in SimpleITK"
From NAMIC Wiki
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
* One issue that we are getting with ITKv4 is that there are a lot more irregular and unrealistic than what we used to get in ITKv3 (see summary [http://www.na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php/BRAINSFit_prostate_registration here] | * One issue that we are getting with ITKv4 is that there are a lot more irregular and unrealistic than what we used to get in ITKv3 (see summary [http://www.na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php/BRAINSFit_prostate_registration here] | ||
* The Slicer4/ITKv4 registration tool should be comparable with the functionality we had in Slicer3/ITKv3, which was evaluated [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmri.23688/abstract;jsessionid=F9AADC56E72CA73A422B9C09728F7E81.f01t03 here] | * The Slicer4/ITKv4 registration tool should be comparable with the functionality we had in Slicer3/ITKv3, which was evaluated [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmri.23688/abstract;jsessionid=F9AADC56E72CA73A422B9C09728F7E81.f01t03 here] | ||
| − | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 21:57, 4 June 2015
Home < 2015 BRAINSFit registration in SimpleITK| Case 9 |
Key Investigators
- Peter Behringer
- Andriy Fedorov
Project Description
Objective
- Our registration module for b-spline deformable registration of prostate MRI uses BRAINSFit in Slicer4/ITKv4.
- One issue that we are getting with ITKv4 is that there are a lot more irregular and unrealistic than what we used to get in ITKv3 (see summary here
- The Slicer4/ITKv4 registration tool should be comparable with the functionality we had in Slicer3/ITKv3, which was evaluated here
Approach, Plan
- Implement BRAINSFit functionality in SimpleITK
- Get ideas from the community how the irregularity can be avoided and implemented in SimpleITK
Progress
- Initialization and rigid registration is implemented using SimpleITK
