Difference between revisions of "2016 Winter Project Week/Projects/AIMInteroperability"
From NAMIC Wiki
Hans.meine (talk | contribs) |
Hans.meine (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
*Discussed topices mentioned under "approach" with Andriy | *Discussed topices mentioned under "approach" with Andriy | ||
*Conclusion: Ultimately, DICOM is the way to go | *Conclusion: Ultimately, DICOM is the way to go | ||
+ | **The PeerJ paper documents the QIICR approach w.r.t. DICOM usage very well (for one of QIICR's use cases) -> definite read! | ||
*AIM is slightly more flexible w.r.t. template building, but that flexibility also limits interoperability, and DICOM allows "private templates", too, if necessary (no template builder, though) | *AIM is slightly more flexible w.r.t. template building, but that flexibility also limits interoperability, and DICOM allows "private templates", too, if necessary (no template builder, though) | ||
|} | |} |
Revision as of 12:16, 7 January 2016
Home < 2016 Winter Project Week < Projects < AIMInteroperabilityKey Investigators
- Hans Meine
- Steve Pieper
- Andriy Fedorov
Project Description
Objective | Approach and Plan | Progress and Next Steps |
---|---|---|
|
|
|