User:Inorton/Slicer4:DTMRI Thoughts

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Clinical perspective

We are using Slicer3 for 2-4 Neurosurgery planning cases per week. We have used the Slicer3 FiducialSeeding functionality in the OR (with OpenIGTLink/BioImageSuite/BrainLab driving the seeding location).

Workflow

  • Scan and push images to clinical PACS and our clinical fMRI processing workstation (has SCP and dicom db capability)
  • Pull/copy images from clinical PACS and processing workstation to research laptop/workstation
  • Load all images:
    • T1, T2, (sometimes CT, PET, CBV from perfusion MR, etc.)
    • 2-4 thresholded fMRI activation volumes (coregistered and resliced to structural in SPM)
    • DTI
  • Preprocess DTI
  • Coregister all images using BrainsFit
  • Segment tumor or pathology region
  • Bring to clinician to use FiducialSeeding to explore area around tumor.
  • (if requested, re-load DICOMs on clinical navigation suite and re-select tracts identified in Slicer)

Background Thoughts

Audiences

  • Clinical/research end users: need simple, efficient, relatively intuitive workflow to generate tractography and perform selection and statistics operations.
  • Pipeline users: the underlying implementations need to be abstracted sufficiently to allow creation of pipeline tools for large-study purposes.
  • Clinical developers: integrate DTI functionality for domain-specific purposes (neurosurgery, neurology, etc.)
  • DTI Researchers:
    • Could use Slicer+ipython+numpy+... instead of matlab and custom code. Advantages: data-reading and visualization boilerplate code already exists. Challenges: learning curve; the python suite is less integrated than matlab, but it's getting better; relative stability: matlab rarely crashes.
    • Implementation of new algorithms in Slicer opens up larger potential userbase.

Slicer advantages

See big list of DTI software here: User:inorton/DTI_Software_List.

There are several excellent DTI-centric applications. What advantages does Slicer have for DTI work?

  • More user-friendly data loading: TrackVis requires command line preprocessing; MedInria and TrackVis require manual gradient entry; DTI studio is limited to ROI exploration only (as far as I know)
  • Many segmentation options already available - no external tool (TrackVis, DTI Studio) or separate interface (MedInria) required.
  • Already integrated with intra-operative systems via OpenIGTLink functionality
  • Open-source license (TrackVis closed, MedInria non-commercial, DTI Studio closed)
  • DicomToNRRDConverter test suite: validate DICOM loading from many different scanner types, with special emphasis on DTI private header information.

Slicer disadvantages

(this is referring to Slicer3 interactive DTMRI tools: these areas need improvement in Slicer 4)

  • Current fiber data model is inefficient for interactive use on large sets (tens of thousands) of fiber tracts.
  • Missing good interactive ROI selection, clustering, and editing capability for pre-computed fibersets.
  • Need subset selection and coloring.
  • Labelmap seeding is not multi-threaded so whole-brain tractography takes forever.
  • Disjointed interface: no one-stop integrated GUI for full DICOMs->tracts->measurements workflow.

Existing NA-MIC resources

Existing open-source external resources

See big list of DTI software here: User:inorton/DTI_Software_List

Retrieved from "https://www.na-mic.org/w/index.php?title=User:Inorton/Slicer4:DTMRI_Thoughts&oldid=63356"