Difference between revisions of "2009 Summer Project Week Transrectal Prostate biopsy"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
==Key Investigators==
 
==Key Investigators==
* Gabor Fichtinger, Andras Lasso, Siddharth Vikal; Queen’s University
+
* Gabor Fichtinger, Andras Lasso (lasso@cs.queensu.ca), Siddharth Vikal; Queen’s University
 
* Allen Tannenbaum, Yi Gao; Georgia Tech
 
* Allen Tannenbaum, Yi Gao; Georgia Tech
 
* Nobuhiko Hata, Junichi Tokuda; BWH
 
* Nobuhiko Hata, Junichi Tokuda; BWH

Revision as of 19:37, 22 June 2009

Home < 2009 Summer Project Week Transrectal Prostate biopsy

Key Investigators

  • Gabor Fichtinger, Andras Lasso (lasso@cs.queensu.ca), Siddharth Vikal; Queen’s University
  • Allen Tannenbaum, Yi Gao; Georgia Tech
  • Nobuhiko Hata, Junichi Tokuda; BWH

Objective

  • Rework current prostate biopsy modules (TRProstateBiopsy and ProstateNav)
    • Create a new standalone module (ProstateSeg) for prostate segmentation, with the latest version of the algorithms, that can be used from the robot modules or in itself.
    • Merge the two prostate robot modules: This will reduce the total amount of code, make it easier to reuse features developed by different teams for different robots, make the testing and bugfixing more efficient, makes possible to support new robots, scanners, and procedures in the future.

Approach, Plan

  • Prostate segmentation: There are two algorithms (Algorithm 1: Shape based segmentation. The shape of prostates are learned and then the new image is segmented using the shapes learned. Algorithm 2: It is based on the Random Walks segmentation algorithm. It need more human input but the result could be interactively improved arbitrarily close to user's expectation.), integrate both of them into a standalone module.
  • Prostate robotics: Merge the existing modules (select one prostate robotics module as a base, clean it up, design generic robot and scanner interfaces, and integrate functions and specific robot/scanner support parts from the other module), so that all the functionalities will be available for all robots.

Our goals for the project week are:

  • Integrate latest developments of the prostate segmentation algorithms into a standalone Slicer module (ProstateSeg)
  • Create tutorial for ProstateSeg module
  • Prepare the merge of the two prostate robotics Slicer modules: design of wizard steps, design of generic robot/scanner interfaces

Progress

  • During the 2009 Winter Project Week a preliminary version of the segmentation algorithms were already integrated.
  • Design discussions with the ProstateNav developers and porting of some functionality (secondary monitor support) are already started.

Detailed plan of the rework

  • ProstateSeg module
    • integrate latest segmentation algorithms (including shape based method)
    • test on clinical dataset
    • create tutorial for the standalone module
  • ProstateNav module
    • Strip down the ProstateNav. We need to have a kind of skeleton before we start merging the two modules.
    • Modify the wizard mechanism. We definitely need a mechanism to configure the wizard to use the module for different procedures / devices.
    • Once we fix the wizard mechanism, we start copying the functions from both modules. Since the skeleton is based on the ProstateNav, and even TRProstateBiopsy module is based on the similar code, it won't be a difficult task.

Design notes for ProstateNav rework

Overview of the ProstateNav / TRProstateBiopsy module rework
  • Configuration: configure the module (mostly wizard steps) to use the module for different procedures/devices
  • Wizard steps:
    • Start up: check devices, connections -- Robot/scanner specific
    • Segmentation: just an integrated GUI for ProstateSeg module
    • Calibration -- Robot/scanner specific
    • Planning: enter targets (could be merged with targeting?)
    • Targeting: driving needle to reach targets -- uses robot/scanner specific functions (display of robot parameters, driving robot, scanner)
    • Manual: manual robot/scanner control -- uses robot/scanner specific functions
    • Verification:
  • User interface
    • Secondary monitor support
  • Communication
    • OpenIGTLink for direct scanner connection
    • OpenIGTLink for DICOM communication with the Scanner
  • Nodes
    • CalibrationVolume
    • TargetingVolume
    • ProstateNav:
      • Configuration info (what robot, scanner is used, what steps are available, etc.)
      • Target descriptors: associated needle type, robot targeting params for each target
      • Robot: needle descriptors (properties of each needle type)
    • Target FiducialList
  • Widgets:
    • Robot: show/hide arm, needle, coverage, calibration object

References

  • Grady, Leo “Random walks for Image Segmentation” IEEE-PAMI 2006
  • S Vikal, Steven Haker, Clare Tempany, Gabor Fichtinger, Prostate contouring in MRI guided biopsy, SPIE Medical Imaging 2009: Image Processing, Proc. SPIE, Vol. 7259, 72594A, 2009
  • S. Vikal, S. Haker, C. Tempany, G Fichtinger, Prostate contouring in MRI guided biopsy, Workshop on Prostate image analysis and computer-assisted intervention, held in conjunction with the 11th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI, September 2008.
  • Singh AK, Guion P, Sears Crouse N, Ullman K, Smith S, Albert PS, Fichtinger G, Choyke PL, Xu S, Kruecker J, Wood BJ, Krieger A, Ning H, “Simultaneous Integrated Boost of Biopsy Proven, MRI Defined Dominant Intra-prostatic Lesions to 95 Gray with IMRT: Early Results of a Phase I NCI Study”, Radiat Oncol. 2007 Sep 18;2(1)
  • Singh AK, Krieger A, Lattouf JB, Guion P, Grubb III RL, Albert PS, Metzger G, Ullman K, Fichtinger G, Ocak I, Choyke PL, Ménard C, Coleman J, “Patient Selection Appears To Determine Prostate Cancer Yield Of Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI Guided Transrectal Biopsies In A Closed 3 Tesla Scanner”, British Journal of Urology, 2007 Oct 8;