Difference between revisions of "2010 Winter Project Week MRI Reconstruction by Registration"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 27: Line 27:
 
<h3>Progress</h3>
 
<h3>Progress</h3>
 
Day 0: I have a dataset, on which initial reconstruction has not yet been performed.  This dataset represents images of a tomato moving in a curved path in-plane, taken with Fiesta.  Every MRI echo is tagged with a scalar position parameter that is roughly monotone and smooth with position, but not precisely proportional.
 
Day 0: I have a dataset, on which initial reconstruction has not yet been performed.  This dataset represents images of a tomato moving in a curved path in-plane, taken with Fiesta.  Every MRI echo is tagged with a scalar position parameter that is roughly monotone and smooth with position, but not precisely proportional.
 +
Day 1: I performed reconstruction of MRI data according to the position ordering from ultrasound.  I learned, from Sandy Wells, the appropriate tools for registering this dataset (ITK, possibly coherence using first-order B-spline as affine).
 +
Day 2-4: Attempt to install ITK.  Learn about the structure of the ITK python bindings and WrapITK from Luis Ibañez.  Join the ITK mailing list to ask build questions.
 +
Day 5: Prototype ultrasound signal database search.
  
 
</div>
 
</div>

Revision as of 16:11, 8 January 2010

Home < 2010 Winter Project Week MRI Reconstruction by Registration

Key Investigators

  • BWH: Ben Schwartz
  • BWH: Sandy Wells

Objective

I am investigating the use of feedback between MRI reconstruction and image registration to deduce both motion parameters and anatomy from a single dataset. My objective for the week is to demonstrate a connected chain from initial reconstruction -> image registration -> new k-space positions -> new reconstruction.

Approach, Plan

Start with initial image sequence (~40 Fiesta images of a moving tomato, tagged with a position parameter). Perform rigid registration between all images in the sequence, using some existing toolbox. Assign registration parameters to the center-of-kspace moment. Fit a curve to translate the position parameter into registration parameters. Evaluate this curve to determine the registration parameters for each line of k-space. Use these deformations to evaluate the true k-space locations, and perform non-uniformly sample reconstruction using some existing toolbox. Repeat as necessary.

Progress

Day 0: I have a dataset, on which initial reconstruction has not yet been performed. This dataset represents images of a tomato moving in a curved path in-plane, taken with Fiesta. Every MRI echo is tagged with a scalar position parameter that is roughly monotone and smooth with position, but not precisely proportional. Day 1: I performed reconstruction of MRI data according to the position ordering from ultrasound. I learned, from Sandy Wells, the appropriate tools for registering this dataset (ITK, possibly coherence using first-order B-spline as affine). Day 2-4: Attempt to install ITK. Learn about the structure of the ITK python bindings and WrapITK from Luis Ibañez. Join the ITK mailing list to ask build questions. Day 5: Prototype ultrasound signal database search.

References