Difference between revisions of "2013 Project Week:US IGT"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 33: Line 33:
 
==Result==
 
==Result==
 
Example result: Correspondences computed between different US sweeps, PLUS kidney data<br>
 
Example result: Correspondences computed between different US sweeps, PLUS kidney data<br>
[[Image:Animation-namic.gif |700px |Preliminary Results: Features correspondences, Kidney Ultrasound Sweeps]]
+
[[Image:Animation-namic.gif |900px |Preliminary Results: Features correspondences, Kidney Ultrasound Sweeps]]
<br>
 
[[Image:Animation-namic-moving.gif |700px |Preliminary Results: Features correspondences, Kidney Ultrasound Sweeps]]
 

Latest revision as of 16:34, 11 January 2013

Home < 2013 Project Week:US IGT

Ultrasound Guidance for Neurosurgery

Key Investigators

  • Matthew Toews, BWH - Harvard Medical School
  • William Wells, BWH - Harvard Medical School
  • Stephen Aylward, Kitware
  • Tamas Ungi, Queens University

Project Description

Objective

  • Develop a system to use calibrated, tracked ultrasound (US) to intra-operatively track and visualize pre-operatively defined neurosurgical targets.
  • Challenges: 2D-3D registration, intra-operative deformation and missing tissue, inter-modal image registration.

Approach, Plan

  • Data preparation: US image and probe tracking information (PLUS system).
  • Code development: pre-op to intra-op image matching using local image features.

Progress

Developed and tested code for:

  • Input of PLUS US data
  • Computation of local feature correspondences between different US sweeps


Result

Example result: Correspondences computed between different US sweeps, PLUS kidney data
Preliminary Results: Features correspondences, Kidney Ultrasound Sweeps