Difference between revisions of "2014 Project Week:Registration Evaluation"
From NAMIC Wiki
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
<div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;"> | <div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;"> | ||
<h3>Progress</h3> | <h3>Progress</h3> | ||
| − | * | + | * discussed with Steve on features which can be reused for interactive registration. |
| + | * reused Steve's landmark registration visualization widget in MRgRT registration module. | ||
| + | * implemented a translation|rotation widget for rigid interactive registration. disucssed with Steve to see if this feature can be refactored to be reused by the transform module. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 03:55, 10 January 2014
Home < 2014 Project Week:Registration Evaluation
MRgRT registration comparison UI
Key Investigators
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center: Kevin Wang
- Isomics: Steve Pieper
Project Description
Objective
- Currently the rigid registration in Slicer lacks the ability to interactively perform the registration. the project aims to develop some common set of features that are useful for across a wide range of workflow that will use rigid registration.
- Common layout set up.
- Common colortable set up.
- Common user interaction for translation and rotation.
- Common landmark based registration toolsets.
- Common image based registration toolsets.
Approach, Plan
- Discuss with Steve and others on how to integrate the existing layout/colortable/landmark management in the landgmark registration module.
- refactor the common set of features.
- use the new common set of features in MRgRT workflow.
Progress
- discussed with Steve on features which can be reused for interactive registration.
- reused Steve's landmark registration visualization widget in MRgRT registration module.
- implemented a translation|rotation widget for rigid interactive registration. disucssed with Steve to see if this feature can be refactored to be reused by the transform module.
