Handling deformable transforms in Slicer meeting minutes

From NAMIC Wiki
Revision as of 13:55, 18 June 2013 by Pinter (talk | contribs) (Page created)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Home < Handling deformable transforms in Slicer meeting minutes
  • Should it be handled on what level?
    • MRML level (Transformable, VolumesLogic?)
    • Using modules (BRAINSResample, Resample Scalar/Vector/DWI Volume) - Subject Hierarchy would know what module can transform what objects using what transforms and use them
  • Invertability / reversibility
    • Should it create clones of the 'hardened' objects? - in Subject Hierarchy
    • Should we maintain a history in the hardened nodes?
    • Harden option on drop (I can't display but can resample) - in Data and Transforms modules
  • Plugin mechanism for registering non-linear transforms
    • Modules register themselves in the fashion "I can apply X type of transform to Y type objects"
      • The application could call these algorithms (instead of registering from outside)
    • GUI decision if hardened
  • Where?
    • Data module
    • Transforms module (display tree, and add a 'Harden' button to the panels)
    • Subject Hierarchy right-click -> apply transform to branch
  • Harden all the way up or until all the parents are linear or just one level a time?
  • Extend to contain bounding box
    • In case of non-linear transforms, go down the edges to specify the output bounding box
    • Options: resample in source lattice (still cloned), the one above, rsample in target volume

Ideas

  • Look at the DICOM transform logic
    • Make frame of reference concept explicit in Slicer?