Difference between revisions of "NAMIC Wiki:DTI:DICOM for DWI and DTI"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(report that 0043,1039 might need to be masked to extract b-value)
(12 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 68: Line 68:
 
  (0019,10bc) DS [-0.804161]
 
  (0019,10bc) DS [-0.804161]
 
  (0019,10bd) DS [-0.420008]
 
  (0019,10bd) DS [-0.420008]
 +
 +
these directions are in the image (rather than scanner bore) frame of reference. The interpretation depends on the Phase Encoding direction (0018,1312). If 0018,1312 is "COL" than 0019,10bb refers to the image columns (i), 0019,10bc refers to the image rows (j) and 0019,10bd refers to the slices (k). If 0018,1312 is "ROW" than 0019,10bb refers to the image rows (j), 0019,10bc refers to the image columns (i) and 0019,10bd refers to the slices (k). There are two caveats: first this assumes that your slices are stacked in spatially ascending order (head to foot for axial acquisitions) regardless of the order that they were saved to disk (which appears to vary depending on how the user plans the scan). Second, you need to adjust the polarity of these directions to match the expectations of the software used for fitting.
 +
 +
Be aware that the b_value stored in tag 0043,1039 may be masked. For example, consider [https://github.com/nikadon/cc-dcm2bids-wrapper/tree/master/dicom-qa-examples/ge-mr750-dwi-b-vals#table series 16] from this archive. This series has images with b_values of both 750 and 1500, but the DICOM tag stores b_values of 1000001500 and 1000000750, as shown in the DICOM dump from image 24 (below). Therefore, if you use 0043,1039 to determine b_value, you should use the modulus of a large number like 100,000.
 +
 +
(0043,1039) IS [1000001500\8\0\0]
  
 
=== Private vendor: Siemens ===
 
=== Private vendor: Siemens ===
Line 114: Line 120:
 
That does not solve your problem with the older datasets and unfortunately there is no easy way to access diffusion information there as it is really only stored in the Siemens shadow part.
 
That does not solve your problem with the older datasets and unfortunately there is no easy way to access diffusion information there as it is really only stored in the Siemens shadow part.
  
 +
==== Update September 2010 ====
 +
 +
Via email, Matthew Brett reported the following information and links which are posted here with his permission.
 +
 +
<pre>
 +
...if you do this:
 +
 +
P= spm_get(Inf,'*','Selct some files')
 +
hdr=spm_dicom_headers(P)
 +
hdr{1}.CSAImageHeaderInfo(22).item(1).val
 +
hdr{1}.CSAImageHeaderInfo(22).item(2).val
 +
hdr{1}.CSAImageHeaderInfo(22).item(3).val
 +
 +
from http://www.na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php/NAMIC_Wiki:DTI:DICOM_for_DWI_and_DTI#Private_vendor:_Siemens
 +
 +
- then the resulting q-like vectors can be rather far off, for reasons
 +
that I now can't remember, but I believe Guy investigated.
 +
 +
In SPM, hdr{1}.CSAImageHeaderInfo is the SPM reading of the Siemens
 +
private header.  We read this in:
 +
 +
http://github.com/matthew-brett/nibabel/blob/master/nibabel/nicom/csareader.py
 +
 +
in the 'read' function.
 +
 +
What SPM calls hdr{1}.CSAImageHeaderInfo(22) has the label
 +
'DiffusionGradientDirection', and is what looks like the q-vector.
 +
However, it can be rather far off, and, in particular, is often rather
 +
far from a unit vector.
 +
 +
Guy recovered from this by using the correctly specified 'B_matrix'
 +
field of the same private header.  I think this is:
 +
 +
hdr{1}.CSAImageHeaderInfo(78)
 +
 +
in SPM-speak, and is arranged as (0-based matrix indices into B matrix)
 +
 +
(0,0), (0, 1), (0,2), (1, 1), (1, 2), (2, 2)
 +
 +
where the B matrix is symmetric.  See 'get_b_matrix' in
 +
 +
http://github.com/matthew-brett/nibabel/blob/master/nibabel/nicom/csareader.py
 +
 +
We (this is obviously optional) rotate to voxel orientation (rather
 +
than DICOM orientation).
 +
 +
We (this is also optional) (credit Ian Nimmo-Smith) resolve to the
 +
nearest positive semi-definite matrix using Niethammer's and C-Fs
 +
tensor algorithm - see 'nearest_pos_semi_def' in:
 +
 +
http://github.com/matthew-brett/nibabel/blob/master/nibabel/nicom/dwiparams.py
 +
 +
Finally, we extract the best estimate of q from the resulting B
 +
matrix, using eigenvalue decomposition - see 'B2q' in the dwiparams -
 +
this is the main part of Guy's algorithm, and Ian N-S code.
 +
 +
But I think you're asking - can I put that on the NAMIC page?
 +
 +
I'm hoping that Guy or Ian or Eleftherios will jump in and tell me
 +
where I am wrong or explain further...
 +
 +
</pre>
  
 +
This bug may or may not be related (now fixed): http://www.na-mic.org/Bug/view.php?id=978
  
 
==== Reference ====
 
==== Reference ====
Line 140: Line 209:
  
 
are available here http://www.medical.philips.com/main/company/connectivity/mri/
 
are available here http://www.medical.philips.com/main/company/connectivity/mri/
 +
 +
=== Private vendor: Toshiba ===
 +
 +
The Toshiba Titan 3T (console software V2.30*R005) uses a standard DICOM attribute for b-value:
 +
* (0018,9087) : Diffusion b-value (for instances with a non-zero b-value).
 +
NOTE: this attribute is missing for those instances with a b-value of zero.
 +
 +
Gradients can be found in a private tag as follows:
 +
* (0029, 1001) : Private Sequence
 +
* >(0029, 1090): Private Byte Data
 +
When the byte data is reversed and the nybble-pairs are swapped, this becomes a DICOM sequence object (with 6 items). The 5th item contains a number of standard DICOM attributes including:
 +
* >>(0018,9087) : Diffusion b-value (which matches the above)
 +
* >>(0018,9089) : Diffusion Gradient Orientation. This is the diffusion direction and will be [0, 0, 0] for the b-value of zero instances.
 +
 +
Sample code for the byte data adjustment:
 +
<pre>
 +
private static byte[] adjustToshibaBytes( byte[] input ) {
 +
    int len = input.length;
 +
    byte[] output = new byte[ len ];
 +
    for( int i = 0; i < len; i++ )
 +
    {
 +
      output[ i ] = (byte)((input[ len - i - 1 ] & 0x0F) + (input[ len - i - 1 ] & 0xF0));
 +
    }
 +
    return output;
 +
}
 +
</pre>
  
 
== DICOM for estimated diffusion tensors ==
 
== DICOM for estimated diffusion tensors ==
Line 159: Line 254:
 
  structure.
 
  structure.
  
== Discussion on DICOM newsgroup ==
+
http://dapoxetine-cheapestpricepriligy.com/ - Dapoxetine <a href="http://order-onlinedoxycycline.net/">Order Doxycycline</a> http://furosemide-lasixonline.net/
 +
 
 +
== Related Links ==
 +
 
 +
[http://www.na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php/NAMIC_Tools_Suite_for_DTI_analysis 2010 Project week: NAMIC tools for DTI analysis ]
  
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.dicom/browse_frm/thread/3d292d9c506b1cbf For cross reference:
+
[http://www.na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php/Projects:DicomToNrrdForDTI DicomToNrrdForDTI Notes]
  
+
[http://www.na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php/DTI:Acquisition Randy's DTI Acquisition notes]
Hi Mathieu
 
 
Thanks for the very interesting links.
 
 
The proposed standard way to address this problem is with
 
the Enhanced MR IOD, which explicitly addresses the
 
attributes for encoding diffusion directionality and B-Value.
 
 
There will likely be no extensions of the existing MR IOD to
 
address this concern, since by policy, we obviously want
 
folks to use the new IOD.
 
 
It would not surprise me if in the interim, vendors started
 
to send some of the new Sup 49 attributes in old IOD
 
instances, but there will almost certainly be no official move
 
to standardize this, and we would certainly not consider
 
adding a non-Sup 49 based mechanism.
 
 
If the Sup 49 mechanisms are not sufficient (e.g. for
 
tensors), then we need to discuss what the gaps are
 
and how to fill them.
 
 
We would not, by the way, ever "encapsulate" the NRRD
 
header, but it would nice if there was a clear mapping between
 
the DICOM Sup 49 attributes and the relevant NRRD
 
attributes, though these are probably obvious.
 
 
David
 
 
Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
 
> Hello again,
 
>
 
>    I am currently involved in a group which is working extensively with
 
> DWI data (diffusion-weighted image). Their acquisition data is coming
 
> in the form of DICOM files. Unfortunately they are currently facing two
 
> problems:
 
> 1. Each vendors stores the gradient directions differently (if at all!)
 
> 2. Even if you have the directions, you don't have the measurement
 
> frame(*). As far as I understand the DICOM specification, there is
 
> currently no way to store this type of information.
 
>
 
>    For issue #1 I am currently gathering information about the major
 
> vendors so that I can add extraction code into gdcm. This would provide
 
> a function to extract the gradient directions and make invisible to
 
> user the different way vendors use to store this information. For more
 
> information see the Wiki at:
 
> http://www.na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php/NAMIC_Wiki:DTI:DICOM_for_DWI_and_DTI
 
>
 
>    For issue #2, -again correct me if I am wrong- but I could not find
 
> anything that could represent this measurement frame. Therefore the
 
> solution we are using is to use an intermediate file format called
 
> NRRD, see for instance:
 
> http://wiki.na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php/NAMIC_Wiki:DTI:Nrrd_format
 
>    Ideally this information should be accessible from a particular
 
> DICOM tag. Can we request an extension of the DICOM standard to allow
 
> us to store this information directly in the DICOM file, which would
 
> greatly simplify the process (avoiding the intermediate NRRD file
 
> format step).
 
>
 
> Regards,
 
> Mathieu
 
> (*)
 
> "measurement frame": relationship between the coordinate frame in which
 
> the gradient coefficients are expressed, and the physical coordinate
 
> frame in which image orientation is defined
 

Revision as of 14:58, 10 September 2018

Home < NAMIC Wiki:DTI:DICOM for DWI and DTI

This page should serve as a place where information about DICOM and DWI/DTI data can be maintained. With time, this information could be used as part of automated solutions for learning all the necessary DWI-related information from a DICOM series. A collection of tools for DICOM is here.

As long DICOM support for DWI information is vendor-specific and/or non-conformant with the info here, the Nrrd format provides a means of recording the DWI-specific information once it is known.

DICOM for DWI

The recommended tags to use in DICOM are as follows:

0018 9075 CS 1 Diffusion Directionality
0018 9076 SQ 1 Diffusion Gradient Direction Sequence
0018 9087 FD 1 Diffusion b-value
0018 9089 FD 3 Diffusion Gradient Orientation
0018 9117 SQ 1 MR Diffusion Sequence
0018 9147 CS 1 Diffusion Anisotropy Type

These are defined in Supplement 49. In particular see section C.8.12.5.9 "MR Diffusion Macro" on pages 94 and 95.

The tags are also referenced in http://medical.nema.org/dicom/2004/04_06PU.PDF (see pages 28-29) as well as in some Working Group Minutes (see pages 155-156).

Two points of interest relative to the NRRD format:

  • The definition of "Diffusion Gradient Orientation" implies that the measurement frame is exactly the identity transform.
  • There appears to be no means of recording the full B-matrix when it is known. This is not an issue for any NAMIC datasets, but can arise in small-bore imaging.

Private vendor: GE

For GE scanners, Signa Excite 12.0 and later, the following tags are reserved for diffusion weighted images:

  • (0019,10e0) : # DTI diffusion directions (release 10.0 & above)
  • (0019,10df) : # DTI diffusion directions (release 9.0 & below)
  • (0019,10d9) : Concatenated SAT {# DTI Diffusion Dir., release 9.0 & below}
  • (0021,105A) : diffusion direction
  • (0043,1039) : Slop_int_6... slop_int_9: (in the GEMS_PARM_01 block)
    • 6: b_value
    • 7: private imaging options 2
    • 8: ihtagging
    • 9: ihtagspc

This information can be found in http://www.gehealthcare.com/usen/interoperability/dicom/docs/5162373r1.pdf

Unfortunately the Dartmouth DWI data (from a GE Signa scanner) does not conform to this (nor do they use the nominally standard 0x0018 tags), as can be seen by running:

dcdump S4.100 | & grep \(0x0019,0x10

which includes:

(0x0019,0x10d9) DS Concatenated SAT      VR=<DS>   VL=<0x0008>  <0.000000>
(0x0019,0x10df) DS User Data     VR=<DS>   VL=<0x0008>  <0.000000>
(0x0019,0x10e0) DS User Data     VR=<DS>   VL=<0x0008>  <0.000000>

so all of the tags which are supposed to store # gradient directions store the value 0! In addition, there is:

(0x0021,0x105a) SL Integer Slop          VR=<SL>   VL=<0x0004>  [0x00000000]

so the supposed representation of diffusion-direction is also empty. The Dartmouth data has the following tags describing the scanner and software version:

(0008,1090) LO [GENESIS_SIGNA]
(0018,1020) LO [09]

In GE DWI images (software version 12.0)

(0008,1090) LO [SIGNA EXCITE]
(0018,1020) LO [12\LX\MR Software release:12.0_M4_0520.a]

diffusion directions are stored under the following tags:

(0019,10bb) DS [0.430617]
(0019,10bc) DS [-0.804161]
(0019,10bd) DS [-0.420008]

these directions are in the image (rather than scanner bore) frame of reference. The interpretation depends on the Phase Encoding direction (0018,1312). If 0018,1312 is "COL" than 0019,10bb refers to the image columns (i), 0019,10bc refers to the image rows (j) and 0019,10bd refers to the slices (k). If 0018,1312 is "ROW" than 0019,10bb refers to the image rows (j), 0019,10bc refers to the image columns (i) and 0019,10bd refers to the slices (k). There are two caveats: first this assumes that your slices are stacked in spatially ascending order (head to foot for axial acquisitions) regardless of the order that they were saved to disk (which appears to vary depending on how the user plans the scan). Second, you need to adjust the polarity of these directions to match the expectations of the software used for fitting.

Be aware that the b_value stored in tag 0043,1039 may be masked. For example, consider series 16 from this archive. This series has images with b_values of both 750 and 1500, but the DICOM tag stores b_values of 1000001500 and 1000000750, as shown in the DICOM dump from image 24 (below). Therefore, if you use 0043,1039 to determine b_value, you should use the modulus of a large number like 100,000.

(0043,1039) IS [1000001500\8\0\0]

Private vendor: Siemens

A Siemens DICOM Conformance Statement is available at

http://www.medical.siemens.com/siemens/en_INT/rg_marcom_FBAs/files/brochures/DICOM/mr/dcs_trio.pdf

No diffusion related tags specified.

David Tuch has stated (in email from December 21, 2005):

The diffusion gradient information and coordinate frame are not provided
in the DICOM hdr for the MGH diffusion sequences.

Tag 0029,1010 may include all necessary information

If you have installed spm (and Matlab), the following spm-File extracts the gradient info:


P= spm_get(Inf,'*','Selct some files')
hdr=spm_dicom_headers(P)
hdr{1}.CSAImageHeaderInfo(22).item(1).val
hdr{1}.CSAImageHeaderInfo(22).item(2).val
hdr{1}.CSAImageHeaderInfo(22).item(3).val

look for "spm_dicom_headers.m" (google or on your hard disk), this spm File shows you how to decode the tag data.

It is easy to write a C or C++ program that does the same, if you have the spm_dicom_headers.m

Credits: Jan Klein <klein AT mevis DOT de>

Update


As far as the latest MR scanner software (2006) version is concerned, a solution for the access of the following Diffusion attributes was provided:

0019;000A;SIEMENS MR HEADER  ;NumberOfImagesInMosaic          ;1;US;1
0019;000B;SIEMENS MR HEADER  ;SliceMeasurementDuration        ;1;DS;1
0019;000C;SIEMENS MR HEADER  ;B_value                         ;1;IS;1
0019;000D;SIEMENS MR HEADER  ;DiffusionDirectionality         ;1;CS;1
0019;000E;SIEMENS MR HEADER  ;DiffusionGradientDirection      ;1;FD;3
0019;000F;SIEMENS MR HEADER  ;GradientMode                    ;1;SH;1
0019;0027;SIEMENS MR HEADER  ;B_matrix                        ;1;FD;6
0019;0028;SIEMENS MR HEADER  ;BandwidthPerPixelPhaseEncode    ;1;FD;1

That does not solve your problem with the older datasets and unfortunately there is no easy way to access diffusion information there as it is really only stored in the Siemens shadow part.

Update September 2010

Via email, Matthew Brett reported the following information and links which are posted here with his permission.

...if you do this:

P= spm_get(Inf,'*','Selct some files')
hdr=spm_dicom_headers(P)
hdr{1}.CSAImageHeaderInfo(22).item(1).val
hdr{1}.CSAImageHeaderInfo(22).item(2).val
hdr{1}.CSAImageHeaderInfo(22).item(3).val

from http://www.na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php/NAMIC_Wiki:DTI:DICOM_for_DWI_and_DTI#Private_vendor:_Siemens

- then the resulting q-like vectors can be rather far off, for reasons
that I now can't remember, but I believe Guy investigated.

In SPM, hdr{1}.CSAImageHeaderInfo is the SPM reading of the Siemens
private header.   We read this in:

http://github.com/matthew-brett/nibabel/blob/master/nibabel/nicom/csareader.py

in the 'read' function.

What SPM calls hdr{1}.CSAImageHeaderInfo(22) has the label
'DiffusionGradientDirection', and is what looks like the q-vector.
However, it can be rather far off, and, in particular, is often rather
far from a unit vector.

Guy recovered from this by using the correctly specified 'B_matrix'
field of the same private header.  I think this is:

hdr{1}.CSAImageHeaderInfo(78)

in SPM-speak, and is arranged as (0-based matrix indices into B matrix)

(0,0), (0, 1), (0,2), (1, 1), (1, 2), (2, 2)

where the B matrix is symmetric.   See 'get_b_matrix' in

http://github.com/matthew-brett/nibabel/blob/master/nibabel/nicom/csareader.py

We (this is obviously optional) rotate to voxel orientation (rather
than DICOM orientation).

We (this is also optional) (credit Ian Nimmo-Smith) resolve to the
nearest positive semi-definite matrix using Niethammer's and C-Fs
tensor algorithm - see 'nearest_pos_semi_def' in:

http://github.com/matthew-brett/nibabel/blob/master/nibabel/nicom/dwiparams.py

Finally, we extract the best estimate of q from the resulting B
matrix, using eigenvalue decomposition - see 'B2q' in the dwiparams -
this is the main part of Guy's algorithm, and Ian N-S code.

But I think you're asking - can I put that on the NAMIC page?

I'm hoping that Guy or Ian or Eleftherios will jump in and tell me
where I am wrong or explain further...

This bug may or may not be related (now fixed): http://www.na-mic.org/Bug/view.php?id=978

Reference

in particular:

Private vendor: Philips

Philips uses the following tags for diffusion weighted images

  • (2001,1003) : B_value;
  • (2001,1004) : Diffusion direction.

Complete DICOM conformance statements for

  • Intera
  • Achieva
  • Panorama
  • Gyroscan
  • Infinion / Eclipse

are available here http://www.medical.philips.com/main/company/connectivity/mri/

Private vendor: Toshiba

The Toshiba Titan 3T (console software V2.30*R005) uses a standard DICOM attribute for b-value:

  • (0018,9087) : Diffusion b-value (for instances with a non-zero b-value).

NOTE: this attribute is missing for those instances with a b-value of zero.

Gradients can be found in a private tag as follows:

  • (0029, 1001) : Private Sequence
  • >(0029, 1090): Private Byte Data

When the byte data is reversed and the nybble-pairs are swapped, this becomes a DICOM sequence object (with 6 items). The 5th item contains a number of standard DICOM attributes including:

  • >>(0018,9087) : Diffusion b-value (which matches the above)
  • >>(0018,9089) : Diffusion Gradient Orientation. This is the diffusion direction and will be [0, 0, 0] for the b-value of zero instances.

Sample code for the byte data adjustment:

private static byte[] adjustToshibaBytes( byte[] input ) {
    int len = input.length;
    byte[] output = new byte[ len ];
    for( int i = 0; i < len; i++ )
    {
       output[ i ] = (byte)((input[ len - i - 1 ] & 0x0F) + (input[ len - i - 1 ] & 0xF0));
    }
    return output;
}

DICOM for estimated diffusion tensors

There is no specification right now in DICOM to support Tensor. Only a supplement:

Supp 63 Parts 3,4,5,6,16,17 Multi-dimensional Interchange Object

The discussion would then be (D. Clunie quote):


Indeed, even if one were to try to standardize in DICOM the encoding
of the entire diffusion tensor, there would no doubt be considerable
debate as to whether to do that as 6 (or 9) planes of an "image", since
there is such a matrix at each spatial location ("pixel"), or as
a special case of the proposed Sup 63 object; the former would keep
image-oriented tools and software happier, the latter would require
implementing a new mechanism and navigating through a more general
structure.

http://dapoxetine-cheapestpricepriligy.com/ - Dapoxetine <a href="http://order-onlinedoxycycline.net/">Order Doxycycline</a> http://furosemide-lasixonline.net/

Related Links

2010 Project week: NAMIC tools for DTI analysis

DicomToNrrdForDTI Notes

Randy's DTI Acquisition notes