Difference between revisions of "Project Week 25/NeedleSegmentation"
From NAMIC Wiki
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| | | | ||
<!-- Approach and Plan bullet points --> | <!-- Approach and Plan bullet points --> | ||
| − | + | * Clustering and morphological filter for data cleaning. | |
| − | + | * Talk with someone of core team to figure out how to remotely process the data. | |
| | | | ||
<!-- Progress and Next steps (fill out at the end of project week) --> | <!-- Progress and Next steps (fill out at the end of project week) --> | ||
Revision as of 07:12, 22 June 2017
Home < Project Week 25 < NeedleSegmentation
Back to Projects List
Key Investigators
- Paolo Zaffino (Magna Graecia University, Italy)
- Salvatore Scaramuzzino (Magna Graecia University/ASL Vercelli, Italy)
- Maria Francesca Spadea (Magna Graecia University, Italy)
- Guillaume Pernelle (remote) (Imperial College, London, UK)
- Alireza Mehrtash (remote) (Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, USA)
- Tina Kapur (Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, USA)
Project Description
NeedleFinder offers tools to segment needles from MRI/CT. It has mostly been tested on MRI from GYN brachytherapy cases. Anyway, this tool requires manual interaction. Now we want to develop a completely automatic strategy to segment the needles. For this purpose, we tested a CNN approach that provides good results, even if a post processing step must be implemented in order to remove some noise and to refine the obtained segmentations.
| Objective | Approach and Plan | Progress and Next Steps |
|---|---|---|
|
|
TDB |
Illustrations
