Difference between revisions of "2014 Project Week:Registration Evaluation"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
<gallery>
 
<gallery>
 
Image:PW-SLC2014.png|[[2014_Winter_Project_Week#Projects|Projects List]]
 
Image:PW-SLC2014.png|[[2014_Winter_Project_Week#Projects|Projects List]]
 +
Image:Mrgrt_interactive_reg.png|new widget for interactive registration
 +
Image:Regcomparison.png| MRgRT registration comparison UI
 
</gallery>
 
</gallery>
  
Line 7: Line 9:
  
 
* Princess Margaret Cancer Center: Kevin Wang
 
* Princess Margaret Cancer Center: Kevin Wang
 +
* Isomics: Steve Pieper
  
 
==Project Description==
 
==Project Description==
Line 30: Line 33:
 
<div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;">
 
<div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;">
 
<h3>Progress</h3>
 
<h3>Progress</h3>
*  
+
* discussed with Steve on features which can be reused for interactive registration.
 +
* reused Steve's landmark registration visualization widget in MRgRT registration module.
 +
* implemented a translation|rotation widget for rigid interactive registration. disucssed with Steve to see if this feature can be refactored to be reused by the transform module.
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>

Latest revision as of 04:03, 10 January 2014

Home < 2014 Project Week:Registration Evaluation

Key Investigators

  • Princess Margaret Cancer Center: Kevin Wang
  • Isomics: Steve Pieper

Project Description

Objective

  • Currently the rigid registration in Slicer lacks the ability to interactively perform the registration. the project aims to develop some common set of features that are useful for across a wide range of workflow that will use rigid registration.
  • Common layout set up.
  • Common colortable set up.
  • Common user interaction for translation and rotation.
  • Common landmark based registration toolsets.
  • Common image based registration toolsets.

Approach, Plan

  • Discuss with Steve and others on how to integrate the existing layout/colortable/landmark management in the landgmark registration module.
  • refactor the common set of features.
  • use the new common set of features in MRgRT workflow.

Progress

  • discussed with Steve on features which can be reused for interactive registration.
  • reused Steve's landmark registration visualization widget in MRgRT registration module.
  • implemented a translation|rotation widget for rigid interactive registration. disucssed with Steve to see if this feature can be refactored to be reused by the transform module.

Reference