Difference between revisions of "MeningiomaMRIRegistrationStudy"
From NAMIC Wiki
(Created page with '=Objective= Accurate registration of same patient/same modality MRI data for longitudinal analysis of tumor progression. =Specific Aims= # Compare the accuracy of registration...') |
(→Data) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
* Ground truth transformation: not available | * Ground truth transformation: not available | ||
* Expert landmarks for registration evaluation: not available | * Expert landmarks for registration evaluation: not available | ||
+ | * Checkerboard appearance of unregistered images for the representative data of interest | ||
+ | |||
+ | ** Case10 | ||
+ | <gallery widths="300px" perrow="3"> | ||
+ | Image:Case10-axial.jpg | ||
+ | Image:Case10-saggital.jpg | ||
+ | Image:Case10-coronal.jpg | ||
+ | </gallery> | ||
=Measures of success= | =Measures of success= |
Revision as of 15:34, 20 July 2009
Home < MeningiomaMRIRegistrationStudyContents
Objective
Accurate registration of same patient/same modality MRI data for longitudinal analysis of tumor progression.
Specific Aims
- Compare the accuracy of registration using existing Slicer and non-Slicer tools
- Identify parameter settings that produce satisfactory results
- Outline the limitations of the available registration tools in the context of the specific clinical research application
Data
- Input images: isotropic post-contrast T1 MRI acquired at different locations of BWH during 2006-2008, used under medical records study IRB. Time period between acquisition of scans for each patient is about 1 year.
- Ground truth transformation: not available
- Expert landmarks for registration evaluation: not available
- Checkerboard appearance of unregistered images for the representative data of interest
- Case10
Measures of success
- qualitative assessment: visually pleasing results
- quantitative assessment: something better than "visually pleasing" (TBD)
- minimum execution time