Difference between revisions of "2017 Winter Project Week/UpdatingCommunityForums"
From NAMIC Wiki
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
** Specific to mailing list to forum migration, Ron's main concern is that with recurring payments there is a possibility of things falling through the cracks and potential interruption of the service | ** Specific to mailing list to forum migration, Ron's main concern is that with recurring payments there is a possibility of things falling through the cracks and potential interruption of the service | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Decision-making policy draft== | ||
+ | 1. Given the topic of interest, initiate discussion on the mailing list | ||
+ | 2. Identify a small circle of community members that are interested to study the topic in more depth | ||
+ | 3. Take the discussion off the general list, work on the analysis of options and alternatives, summarize findings on the wiki or similar | ||
+ | 4. Announce the in-depth discussion of the topic for the Slicer Community hangout, encourage anyone that is interested in weighing in on the topic to join the discussion (Note: we might want to advertise Slicer Hangout appropriately, include agenda in the announcement email directly, and advertise the event to Slicer users as well as developers) | ||
+ | 5. Hopefully, reach consensus at the hangout and proceed with the agreed plan. | ||
==Background and References== | ==Background and References== |
Revision as of 03:46, 11 January 2017
Home < 2017 Winter Project Week < UpdatingCommunityForumsKey Investigators
- Andrey Fedorov
- Andras Lasso
- Mike Halle
- Steve Pieper
- Isaiah Norton
- Tina Kapur
- Teodora Szasz
- The COMMUNITY
Project Description
Objective | Approach and Plan | Progress and Next Steps |
---|---|---|
|
|
|
Decision-making policy draft
1. Given the topic of interest, initiate discussion on the mailing list 2. Identify a small circle of community members that are interested to study the topic in more depth 3. Take the discussion off the general list, work on the analysis of options and alternatives, summarize findings on the wiki or similar 4. Announce the in-depth discussion of the topic for the Slicer Community hangout, encourage anyone that is interested in weighing in on the topic to join the discussion (Note: we might want to advertise Slicer Hangout appropriately, include agenda in the announcement email directly, and advertise the event to Slicer users as well as developers) 5. Hopefully, reach consensus at the hangout and proceed with the agreed plan.
Background and References
- Discourse discussion / proposal on the Slicer mailing list
- Discussions of GitHub hosting:
- Discourse and Slack (or other group chat apps like IRC, HipChat, Gitter, etc)
- https://www.slicer.org/wiki/Documentation/Labs/DocumentationImprovments
- NodeBB - like Discourse https://nodebb.org/pricing
- https://experts.feverbee.com/t/discourse-vs-nodebb/1384/6