Difference between revisions of "DBP:Harvard:Software:Minutes:9"
From NAMIC Wiki
m (Update from Wiki) |
m (Update from Wiki) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | ''Agenda for 9/ | + | ''Agenda for 9/21/05'' |
− | <br />''' | + | <br />'''Comparison of LSDIrecon and DTMRI scalar measures, also including Steve's "include zeros" functionality''' (details [[DBP:Harvard:Software:Testing:DTI:Slicer|here]]) |
− | + | # Differences in FA are always <0.25% (usually much smaller) | |
− | + | # Raul removed the Scale Factor, which seems to make Trace values very small compared to ADC | |
− | + | #* BUT DTMRI trace values are still consistent (in relative terms) with LSDIrecon ADC, i.e., always 250X smaller | |
− | * | + | # Including zeros (Steve's added button) did not make a difference. Does this mean 1) there is no difference, or 2) the "include zeros" button does not work? |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | <br />''' | + | <br />'''Diffusion cases acquired Coronal AP''' (details [[DBP:Harvard:Software:Bugs:Coregistration_5-11-05|here]]) |
− | * | + | * Fiber tracking seems to be fine on these cases |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | <br />'''DTI | + | <br />'''2 ROI method for DTI fiber tracking''' (details [[DBP:Harvard:Software:Bugs:2ROI|here]]) |
− | * | + | * I can't get it to work- please help! |
+ | * "NOT" functionality: Raul is working on it | ||
− | <br />''' | + | <br />'''Higher resolution scans on 3T''' (details [[DBP:Harvard:Software:Wish:3T_8-24-05|here]]) |
− | * | + | * Fibertracking was done after smoothing the tensor. |
− | <br />''' | + | <br />'''Fiber clustering''' (details[[DBP:Harvard:Software:Wish:Cluster_3-29-05|here]]) |
− | * | + | * fiber backtracking/corpus labeling method? |
− | |||
− | |||
− | <br />''' | + | <br />'''DTI case for Lynn DeLisi''' (details from Sylvain to Raul [[DBP:Harvard:Software:Minutes:9-7-05:DeLisi|here]]) |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | * | + | * Marek, do we know what variables/examples she wants from us? |
<br /> | <br /> | ||
Line 44: | Line 33: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
− | <br />''' | + | <br />'''Other issues...''' |
− | * | + | * '''Stephan's LSDIrecon code''' (details [[DBP:Harvard:Software:Wish:Stephan_code_8-24-05|here]]) |
− | * | + | * '''Background noise in DTMRI scalar measures''' (details [[DBP:Harvard:Software:Bugs:Noise|here]]) |
Revision as of 13:19, 18 December 2006
Home < DBP:Harvard:Software:Minutes:9Agenda for 9/21/05
Comparison of LSDIrecon and DTMRI scalar measures, also including Steve's "include zeros" functionality (details here)
- Differences in FA are always <0.25% (usually much smaller)
- Raul removed the Scale Factor, which seems to make Trace values very small compared to ADC
- BUT DTMRI trace values are still consistent (in relative terms) with LSDIrecon ADC, i.e., always 250X smaller
- Including zeros (Steve's added button) did not make a difference. Does this mean 1) there is no difference, or 2) the "include zeros" button does not work?
Diffusion cases acquired Coronal AP (details here)
- Fiber tracking seems to be fine on these cases
2 ROI method for DTI fiber tracking (details here)
- I can't get it to work- please help!
- "NOT" functionality: Raul is working on it
Higher resolution scans on 3T (details here)
- Fibertracking was done after smoothing the tensor.
Fiber clustering (detailshere)
- fiber backtracking/corpus labeling method?
DTI case for Lynn DeLisi (details from Sylvain to Raul here)
- Marek, do we know what variables/examples she wants from us?
Other issues...
- Stephan's LSDIrecon code (details here)
- Background noise in DTMRI scalar measures (details here)