Difference between revisions of "Projects:RegistrationLibrary:RegLib C04"
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
=== Registration Results=== | === Registration Results=== | ||
[[Image:RegLib_C04_T1Gd-PD_unreg_AnimGif.gif||500px|Unregistered baseline data: PD vs. T1Gd]] | [[Image:RegLib_C04_T1Gd-PD_unreg_AnimGif.gif||500px|Unregistered baseline data: PD vs. T1Gd]] | ||
− | [[Image:RegLib_C04_PDunreg_AnimGif.gif||500px|Unregistered followup data: PD exam 2 vs. exam 1]] | + | [[Image:RegLib_C04_PDunreg_AnimGif.gif||500px|Unregistered followup data: PD exam 2 vs. exam 1]]<br> |
− | [[Image: | + | [[Image:RegLib_C04_T1Gd1-PD1_reg_AnimGif.gif|500px|Registered baseline data]] |
− | [[Image:RegLib_C04_3DLesionChange_AnimGif.gif| | + | [[Image:RegLib_C04_PDreg_AnimGif.gif|500px|Registered followup data]]<br> |
+ | [[Image:RegLib_C04_3DLesionChange_AnimGif.gif|200px|Lesion change visualization in 3D]] | ||
=== Download === | === Download === |
Revision as of 22:14, 19 February 2010
Home < Projects:RegistrationLibrary:RegLib C04Back to ARRA main page
Back to Registration main page
Back to Registration Use-case Inventory
Contents
Slicer Registration Library Case 04: Intra-subject Brain MR of Multiple Sclerosis: Multi-contrast series for lesion change assessment
Objective / Background
This scenario occurs in many forms whenever we wish to assess change in a series of multi-contrast MRI. The follow-up scan(s) are to be aligned with the baseline, but also the different series within each exam need to be co-registered, since the subject may have moved between acquisitions. Hence we have a set of nested registrations. This particular exam features a dual echo scan (PD/T2), where the two structural scans are aligned by default. The post-contrast T1-GdDTPA scan however is not necessarily aligned with the dual echo. Also the post-contrast scan is taken with a clipped field of view (FOV) and a lower axial resolution, with 4mm slices and a 1mm gap (which we treat here as a de facto 5mm slice).
Keywords
MRI, brain, head, intra-subject, multiple sclerosis, MS, multi-contrast, change assessment, dual echo, nested registration
Input Data
- reference/fixed : PD baseline exam , 0.9375 x 0.9375 x 3 mm voxel size, axial acquisition, RAS orientation.
- reference/fixed : T2 baseline exam , 0.9375 x 0.9375 x 3 mm voxel size, axial acquisition, RAS orientation.
- moving: T1-GdDTPA baseline exam 0.9375 x 0.9375 x 5 mm voxel size, axial acquisition.
- moving: PD follow-up exam 0.9375 x 0.9375 x 3 mm voxel size, axial acquisition.
- tag: T2 follow-up exam 0.9375 x 0.9375 x 3 mm voxel size, axial acquisition.
- moving:T1-GdDTPA follow-up exam0.9375 x 0.9375 x 5 mm voxel size, axial acquisition.
Registration Challenges
- we have multiple nested transforms: each exam is co-registered within itself, and then the exams are aligned to eachother
- potential pathology change can affect the registration
- anisotropic voxel size causes difficulty in rotational alignment
- clipped FOV and low tissue contrast of the post-contrast scan
Key Strategies
- we first register the post-contrast scans within each exam to the PD
- we also move the T2 exam within the same Xform
- second we register the follow-up PD scan to the baseline PD
- we then nest the first alignment within the second
- we compare T1Gd to T1Gd, which went through 2 transforms. We correct residual misalignment with a 3rd correction transform
- because of the contrast differences and anisotropic resolution we use Mutual Information as cost function for better robustness
- we adjust the expected translation and rotational parameter settings to the visual assessment of the input data (i.e. initial misalignment)
Registration Results
Download
- Registration Library Case 04: MS Multi-contrast series (PD,T2, T1-GdDTPA): Lesion change assessment (Data,Presets, Solution, zip file 17 MB)
- download/view guided video tutorial
- download power point tutorial
Link to User Guide: How to Load/Save Registration Parameter Presets