Difference between revisions of "2017 Winter Project Week/UpdatingCommunityForums"
From NAMIC Wiki
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
==Decision-making policy draft== | ==Decision-making policy draft== | ||
1. Given the topic of interest, initiate discussion on the mailing list | 1. Given the topic of interest, initiate discussion on the mailing list | ||
+ | |||
2. Identify a small circle of community members that are interested to study the topic in more depth | 2. Identify a small circle of community members that are interested to study the topic in more depth | ||
+ | |||
3. Take the discussion off the general list, work on the analysis of options and alternatives, summarize findings on the wiki or similar | 3. Take the discussion off the general list, work on the analysis of options and alternatives, summarize findings on the wiki or similar | ||
+ | |||
4. Announce the in-depth discussion of the topic for the Slicer Community hangout, encourage anyone that is interested in weighing in on the topic to join the discussion (Note: we might want to advertise Slicer Hangout appropriately, include agenda in the announcement email directly, and advertise the event to Slicer users as well as developers) | 4. Announce the in-depth discussion of the topic for the Slicer Community hangout, encourage anyone that is interested in weighing in on the topic to join the discussion (Note: we might want to advertise Slicer Hangout appropriately, include agenda in the announcement email directly, and advertise the event to Slicer users as well as developers) | ||
+ | |||
5. Hopefully, reach consensus at the hangout and proceed with the agreed plan. | 5. Hopefully, reach consensus at the hangout and proceed with the agreed plan. | ||
Revision as of 03:46, 11 January 2017
Home < 2017 Winter Project Week < UpdatingCommunityForumsKey Investigators
- Andrey Fedorov
- Andras Lasso
- Mike Halle
- Steve Pieper
- Isaiah Norton
- Tina Kapur
- Teodora Szasz
- The COMMUNITY
Project Description
Objective | Approach and Plan | Progress and Next Steps |
---|---|---|
|
|
|
Decision-making policy draft
1. Given the topic of interest, initiate discussion on the mailing list
2. Identify a small circle of community members that are interested to study the topic in more depth
3. Take the discussion off the general list, work on the analysis of options and alternatives, summarize findings on the wiki or similar
4. Announce the in-depth discussion of the topic for the Slicer Community hangout, encourage anyone that is interested in weighing in on the topic to join the discussion (Note: we might want to advertise Slicer Hangout appropriately, include agenda in the announcement email directly, and advertise the event to Slicer users as well as developers)
5. Hopefully, reach consensus at the hangout and proceed with the agreed plan.
Background and References
- Discourse discussion / proposal on the Slicer mailing list
- Discussions of GitHub hosting:
- Discourse and Slack (or other group chat apps like IRC, HipChat, Gitter, etc)
- https://www.slicer.org/wiki/Documentation/Labs/DocumentationImprovments
- NodeBB - like Discourse https://nodebb.org/pricing
- https://experts.feverbee.com/t/discourse-vs-nodebb/1384/6