Difference between revisions of "Oct 08 2009 meeting: schedule for Oct 9"
From NAMIC Wiki
(Created page with 'With Ron: * what caused the hole in Valentino data; * check the quality of N3 bias correction; * learn how to manually segment sub-cortical structures. With Sandy: * check t…') |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* check the quality of N3 bias correction; | * check the quality of N3 bias correction; | ||
| − | * learn how to manually segment sub-cortical structures | + | * learn how to manually segment sub-cortical structures |
With Sandy: | With Sandy: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * discuss EM segmenter -- talk with Chris, go through all recommendations for Ginger to take home | ||
| + | |||
| + | * workflow -- how much benefit we can expect if we make it more complex, is it worth it (e.g., do EM segment on each subject, then re-run atlas construction without bias field, considering there is improvement) | ||
| + | |||
| + | * can we think of quantitative criterion for bias correction with N3? -- we could script and run parameter exploration | ||
* check the quality of the smoothed data; | * check the quality of the smoothed data; | ||
| Line 13: | Line 19: | ||
With Chris: | With Chris: | ||
| − | * information about the | + | * information about the second timepoint data / data transfer issue; |
| + | |||
| + | * confirm there are no intellectual property issues for the workflow tools originating from VT -- can we put everything in NA-MIC sandbox to maximize reuse later? | ||
With all: | With all: | ||
| − | * build up the list of non-slicer3 tools / scripts | + | * build up the list of non-slicer3 tools / scripts, discuss sharing of code and data (data -- after the publication(s) are out) |
* discuss protocols on documentation; | * discuss protocols on documentation; | ||
Revision as of 04:30, 9 October 2009
Home < Oct 08 2009 meeting: schedule for Oct 9With Ron:
- what caused the hole in Valentino data;
- check the quality of N3 bias correction;
- learn how to manually segment sub-cortical structures
With Sandy:
- discuss EM segmenter -- talk with Chris, go through all recommendations for Ginger to take home
- workflow -- how much benefit we can expect if we make it more complex, is it worth it (e.g., do EM segment on each subject, then re-run atlas construction without bias field, considering there is improvement)
- can we think of quantitative criterion for bias correction with N3? -- we could script and run parameter exploration
- check the quality of the smoothed data;
With Chris:
- information about the second timepoint data / data transfer issue;
- confirm there are no intellectual property issues for the workflow tools originating from VT -- can we put everything in NA-MIC sandbox to maximize reuse later?
With all:
- build up the list of non-slicer3 tools / scripts, discuss sharing of code and data (data -- after the publication(s) are out)
- discuss protocols on documentation;
- conform proposed work flow;
- discuss time-line / winter NAMIC meeting/ potential publications.
