Difference between revisions of "Project Week 25/Slice-to-Volume Registration to Support MRI guided Interventions"
From NAMIC Wiki
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
|<!-- Progress and Next steps (fill out at the end of project week), bullet points --> | |<!-- Progress and Next steps (fill out at the end of project week), bullet points --> | ||
− | + | * discussed the motivation for non-regit registration of planing MRI/CT to iMRI/iCT | |
+ | ** reducing the need of contrast agend administration in both iMRI and iCT | ||
+ | ** providing any additional information that is either containt in planning data or added / annotated in its reference frame | ||
+ | ** providing additional information from other modalities like PET (Pre-fusing several planing volumes) | ||
+ | ** reducing mental effort for interventionalist | ||
+ | * I got showed a manual workflow in Slicer to solve the basic task with state of the art methods | ||
+ | * I got insights into the development with and for Slicer | ||
+ | * I started to implement a python Slicer Extension to automate the previously found workflow using several aspects of slicer (CLI, Python Scripting, simpleITK, sitkUtils) | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 10:08, 30 June 2017
Home < Project Week 25 < Slice-to-Volume Registration to Support MRI guided Interventions
Back to Projects List
Key Investigators
- Gino Gulamhussene (University of Magdeburg, Germany)
- Andras Lasso (Queen's University, Canada)
Project Description
Objective | Approach and Plan | Progress and Next Steps |
---|---|---|
|
|
|